Criticism of Curriculum Quality Assessment Models: A Narrative Review
-
Zahra HeydariFard
,
Ahmad Tahmasebi Ghorrabi
,
Salime Goharinezhad
,
Iravan Masoudi Asl
,
Alireza Dahim
Abstract
Context: Curricula are the heart of educational centers, and their continuous evaluation and revision are among the necessities of a sustainable and responsive program to respond to the needs of the beneficiaries who use them. Evaluation models are not comprehensive and are associated with shortcomings. The current review has investigated curriculum evaluation models using a narrative approach. In this research, curricula definitions, curriculum elements and components, how to evaluate their usefulness and quality, the necessity of revising and changing if needed, and finally, their criticisms were discussed. Curriculum evaluation models have strengths and weaknesses; however, curriculum evaluation is a necessity for every country due to its importance in improving the level of education and training of specialized human resources. It is suggested to design a new model suitable for the environmental and educational conditions of each country using the existing models.
1. Afzalkhani M, Navehebrahim A. A study of the quality of highschool curriculumin relation to the attention paid to the creativity components. J Instruction Evaluation. 2010;3(10):83-110.
2. Walkington J. Designing the engineering curriculum to cater for generic skills and student diversity. Australasian J Engineering Edu. 2001;9(2):127-35.
3. Menges R. Promoting inquiry into one’s own teaching. Informing faculty development for teacher educators:(Contemporary studies in social and policy issues in education: The David C Anchin Center series) Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 1994.
4. Karami M, Momeni M. [Global marketplace and its impact on curriculum design]. J Curriculum Studies. 2011;6(21):67-100. Persian.
5. Kaviani H, Nasr A. The research synthesis of challenges in curriculum of higher education in the recent decades and potential solutions. J higher edu curriculum studies. 2016;7(13):7-34.
6. Altbach P. Comparative studies in higher education. Encyclopedia of Comparative Education and National Systems Education.1988. 6-7]. Available from.
7. de Labry Lima AO, Mochon LG, Martinez AC, Ruiz EM, BalbinoJE. Mapping capacity to conduct health technology assessment in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. Croat Med J. 2016;57(1):66-70. [PubMed ID:26935616]. [PubMed Central ID:PMC4800330]. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2016.57.66.
8. Douw K, Vondeling H, Bakketeig LS, Gabbay J, Hansen NW, Kristensen FB. HTA education and training in Europe. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002;18(4):808-19. [PubMed ID:12602081]. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462302000612.
9. Middlehurst R, Woodhouse D. Coherent systems for external quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education. 2006;1(3):257-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/1353832950010307.
10. Annala J, Mäkinen M. Communities of practice in higher education: Contradictory narratives of a university-wide curriculum reform. Studies Higher Edu. 2016;42(11):1941-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1125877.
11. Wit Hd, Knight J. Quality and internationalisation in higher education. Organisation Economic Co-operation Develop. 1999.
12. Raddon A. Engaging the Curriculum in Higher Education- By Ronald Barnett and Kelly Coate. British J Edu Studies. 2008;56(2):234-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2008.00402_3.x.
13. Samieenasab M, Soleimani Y. [Criticizing the conventional approach to economic curriculum in the country and designing the master degree program of Moqawama economy]. Pizhuhishnāmah-i intiqādī-i mutūn va barnāmah hā-yi ̒ulūm-i insāni,Pizhuhish nāmah-i intiqādī-i mutūn va barnāmah hā-yi ̒ulūm-iinsāni (Critical Studies in Texts & Programs of Human Sciences.2017;16:81-51. Persian.
14. Alizadeh Niri S, Adib Y. A Study of hidden curriculum dimensions in first-grade female high-school teachers’ method of teaching from the students’ point of view. J Instruction Evaluation. 2013;6(23):55-76.
15. Sink DS. Productivity management: Planning, measurement and evaluation, control, and improvement. (No Title). 1985.
16. Pinar WF. The reconceptualisation of curriculum studies. J curriculum studies. 1978;10(3):205-14.
17. Tyler RW. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago press; 2013.
18. FATHI VK, Shafiee Z. Quality assessment of adult education curriculum in universities. Curriculum. 2007.
19. Rezaei M. The Students and Graduates’ Viewpoints about Agricultural Majors’ Curriculum. J Agricultural Edu Administration Res. 2015;7(33):28-46.
20. Pezeshki Rad G, Mohtashem H. Internal evaluation as an appropriate approach to improve higher education system (the case study of agricultural extension and education Department, Tarbiat Modarres University). Res Planning Higher Edu. 2023;9(3):27-48.
21. Gh M, Haji-Hosseinnejad G. Designing of curriculum model for training teacher educator based on competencie’s reflective practice. J Curriculum Stu. 2018;13(50):45-74.
22. Hatami J, Shahmouhammadi M, Choopankare V, Yadgar M. Industrial design curriculum requirements in Iran. J Visual Applied Arts. 2017;9(18):121-35.
23. Magnussen L, Amundson MJ. Undergraduate nursing student experience. Nurs Health Sci. 2003;5(4):261-7. [PubMed ID:14622377]. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2018.2003.00158.x.
24. Poudeh MD, Shams B, Ashourioun V, Esmaeilee A, Nasri P, Hosseini M. Internal assessment of Isfahan general medicine curriculum based on basic standards of ministry of health and medical education: A model for evaluation and analysis of results. Iran J med Edu. 2011;10(5).
25. Nasri F. Provide an optimal model for assessing the quality of the naval strategic criminal training system. Interdisciplinary Studies on Strategic Knowledge. 2019;3(9):163-200.
26. Piri M, Asadian S, Derakhshani S. Evaluation of the quality of physical education curriculum (exercise physiology) in the master’s degree from the viewpoint of students. J Applied Exercise Physiol. 2018;14(27):77-85.
27. Ramsden P. Learning to Lead in Higher Education. 1998.
28. Khoshsima H, Mohammadi J, Mostafapour E. A comparative study of students’ and teachers’ attitude toward self assessment: A case study of iranian context. International J. 2016;3(1).
29. Sanyal BC, Martin M. Quality assurance and the role of accreditation: An overview. Report: Higher education in the world 2007: Accreditation for quality assurance: What is at stake? 2007.
30. Tirgar A, Kazemi F, Babazadeh S, Aghalari Z, Gholinia-Ahangar H. Assessing the Students ’ Viewpoint about teaching a course by several lecturer in Babol University of Medical Sciences. Res Med Edu. 2018;10(1):38-0. https://doi.org/10.29252/rme.10.1.38.
31. Paul R. Learning to teach in higher education. RoutledgeFalmer London. 2003.
32. Prajogo DI, Sohal AS. The relationship between organization strategy, total quality management (TQM), and organization performance––the mediating role of TQM. Europ J Operational Res. 2006;168(1):35-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.03.033.
33. Ghoorchian N, Shahrakipoor H. Study of the World’s Higher Education Assessment Systems to Propose an Appropriate Assessment Model for Iran’s Higher Education Assessment Aystem. Future study Management. 2010;21(85):1-19.
34. Piri Sagharloo M, Tahriri A, Hejazi R, Samadi Larghani M. The role of leadership, planning, and supervision of the higher education system in the development of academic accounting in Iran. Accounting Auditing Res. 2022;14(56):31-52.
35. Rahdari M, Nasr AR, Nili MR, Tork Ladani B. Evaluating professional skills and employment status of baccalaureate\’s alumni in Information Technology Engineering. Res Planning Higher Edu. 2023;21(2):1-24.
36. Faraji Armaki A, Panahi B. Viewpoint of general medicine students and faculty members about basic sciences curriculum. Edu Strategies in Med Sci. 2011;4(2):73-6.
37. FATHI VK, KHOSRAVI BA, Hajatmand F. Evaluating internal quality of educational programs of Ph. D medical ethics curriculum from point of professors and students. Medical Ethics. 2014.
38. Nasrollahinia F, Yamanidouzi M, Arefi M, Mohamadi R. Survay quality of implementation of internal evaluation of departments in shahid beheshti university From the perspective of fac-ulty members. J Educat Planning Stud. 2019;8(15):121-47.
39. Karami M, Fattahi H. Changing higher education curriculum, case study: Graduate curriculum in educational planning. J Higher Edu Curriculum Stu. 2013;4(7):110-36.
40. Ebrahim Kafoori K, Maleki H, Khosravi Babadi A. The study of the influence of klein’s curriculum components on the 1st grade of high school studentsâ math course drop out: Considering the
viewpoint of the curriculum counterparts. Res in Curriculum Planning. 2015;12(44):50-62.
41. Mehrmohammadi M. [Curriculum: Theories, approaches and perspectives]. Tehran: Samt& behnashr press. 2009. Persian.
42. Lewy A, Nevo D. Evaluation roles in education. Gordon & Breach Science Pub. 1981.
43. Lattuca LR, Stark JS. Shaping the college curriculum: Academic plans in context. John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
44. Waks LJ. How Globalization Can Cause Fundamental Curriculum Change: An American Perspective. J Edu Change. 2003;4(4):383-418. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:Jedu.0000006068.61419.90.
45. YAMANI N, NASR A, SABRI M. Curriculum Renewal In Medical Education. Curriculum Renewal In Medical Education. 2010.
46. Hull E, St Romain JA, Alexander P, Schaff S, Jones W. Moving cemeteries: a framework for facilitating curriculum revision. Nurse Educ. 2001;26(6):280-2. [PubMed ID:12141645]. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006223-200111000-00013.
47. Cuellar N. The seven habits for highly effective curriculum revision. Nurse Educ. 2001;26(2):61-3. [PubMed ID:16372626]. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006223-200103000-00008.
48. Thornton SJ. Educating the educators: Rethinking subject matter and methods. Theory Into Practice. 2001;40(1):72-8. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4001_11.
49. Shobeiri SM, Shamsi S. Internal quality assessment program Master of Education degree from the perspective of teachers, students and educational experts Payam Noor University. Res School Virtual Learning. 2015;3(9):83-94.
50. Bayanfar F, Maleki H, Dlavar A, Saif A-A. A study on the probable impact of junior high school hidden curriculum on student achievement: Presenting an efficient model. Educational Innovations. 2011;10(1):71-100.
51. Bagherinia F, Bagherinia H, Rahim Mosavi S. Assessment of the students’ attitude toward business with regard to higher education curriculum: Case study of Esfarayen University. Inter J Management, Accounting Economics. 2015;2(8).
52. Amini M, MARZOOGHI R, Mazidi M, Torkzadeh J, Mohammadi M. An investigation into the outcomes of implicit curriculum in higher education. J Theory and Practice. 2015.
53. Keshavarzi M, Rahgozar H. The place and role of curriculum in industrial training. Curriculum. 2011.
54. Akker J. Vanden.(2003). Curriculum persective: An introduction. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher; 2003.
55. Fathi Vajargah K, Hasan Pardakhtchi M, Rabeeyi M. Effectiveness evaluation of virtual learning courses in high education system of IRAN (Case of Ferdowsi University). Info communicat technology edu sci. 2011;1(4):5-21.
56. Mehrmohammadi M. Curriculum Theories, Approaches and Perspectives. Tehran. Swiss Association Market Technicians. 2010.
57. Mehdizadeh AH, Shafiei N. The assessment of curriculum quality in teachers education courses. J Edu Psychol. 2009;1(1):43-57.
58. Lehoux P, Battista RN, Granados A, Gallo P, Tailliez S, Coyle D, etal. International Master’s Program in health technology assessment and management: Assessment of the first edition (2001--2003). Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21(1):104-12. [PubMed ID:15736521]. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462305050130.
59. Zolfaghari M, Yazdizadeh B. Quality of the curriculum of health technology assessment master program in Iran. Health Technol Assessment in Action. 2020.
60. Amini M, Ganji M, Yazdkhasti A. Quality assessment of engineering curricula based on the views of students (case study: Kashan University). Iran J Engineering Edu. 2012;14(55):61-87.
61. Khan SH, Saeed M. Evaluating the quality of BEd programme: Students’ views of their college experiences. Teach Teacher Edu. 2010;26(4):760-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.011.
62. Kırkgöz Y. The challenge of developing and maintaining curriculum innovation at higher education. Procedia - Social Behavioral Sci. 2009;1(1):73-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.015.
63. Ghorrabi AT, Heydari M, Choobdarnezhad M, Dahim A, Heydarifard Z. Evaluation of the overall quality of the health technology assessment educational program from the perspectives of university professors and learners in Iran. Health Technol Assessment Action. 2023. https://doi.org/10.18502/htaa.v7i1.13301.
2. Walkington J. Designing the engineering curriculum to cater for generic skills and student diversity. Australasian J Engineering Edu. 2001;9(2):127-35.
3. Menges R. Promoting inquiry into one’s own teaching. Informing faculty development for teacher educators:(Contemporary studies in social and policy issues in education: The David C Anchin Center series) Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 1994.
4. Karami M, Momeni M. [Global marketplace and its impact on curriculum design]. J Curriculum Studies. 2011;6(21):67-100. Persian.
5. Kaviani H, Nasr A. The research synthesis of challenges in curriculum of higher education in the recent decades and potential solutions. J higher edu curriculum studies. 2016;7(13):7-34.
6. Altbach P. Comparative studies in higher education. Encyclopedia of Comparative Education and National Systems Education.1988. 6-7]. Available from.
7. de Labry Lima AO, Mochon LG, Martinez AC, Ruiz EM, BalbinoJE. Mapping capacity to conduct health technology assessment in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. Croat Med J. 2016;57(1):66-70. [PubMed ID:26935616]. [PubMed Central ID:PMC4800330]. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2016.57.66.
8. Douw K, Vondeling H, Bakketeig LS, Gabbay J, Hansen NW, Kristensen FB. HTA education and training in Europe. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002;18(4):808-19. [PubMed ID:12602081]. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462302000612.
9. Middlehurst R, Woodhouse D. Coherent systems for external quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education. 2006;1(3):257-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/1353832950010307.
10. Annala J, Mäkinen M. Communities of practice in higher education: Contradictory narratives of a university-wide curriculum reform. Studies Higher Edu. 2016;42(11):1941-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1125877.
11. Wit Hd, Knight J. Quality and internationalisation in higher education. Organisation Economic Co-operation Develop. 1999.
12. Raddon A. Engaging the Curriculum in Higher Education- By Ronald Barnett and Kelly Coate. British J Edu Studies. 2008;56(2):234-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2008.00402_3.x.
13. Samieenasab M, Soleimani Y. [Criticizing the conventional approach to economic curriculum in the country and designing the master degree program of Moqawama economy]. Pizhuhishnāmah-i intiqādī-i mutūn va barnāmah hā-yi ̒ulūm-i insāni,Pizhuhish nāmah-i intiqādī-i mutūn va barnāmah hā-yi ̒ulūm-iinsāni (Critical Studies in Texts & Programs of Human Sciences.2017;16:81-51. Persian.
14. Alizadeh Niri S, Adib Y. A Study of hidden curriculum dimensions in first-grade female high-school teachers’ method of teaching from the students’ point of view. J Instruction Evaluation. 2013;6(23):55-76.
15. Sink DS. Productivity management: Planning, measurement and evaluation, control, and improvement. (No Title). 1985.
16. Pinar WF. The reconceptualisation of curriculum studies. J curriculum studies. 1978;10(3):205-14.
17. Tyler RW. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago press; 2013.
18. FATHI VK, Shafiee Z. Quality assessment of adult education curriculum in universities. Curriculum. 2007.
19. Rezaei M. The Students and Graduates’ Viewpoints about Agricultural Majors’ Curriculum. J Agricultural Edu Administration Res. 2015;7(33):28-46.
20. Pezeshki Rad G, Mohtashem H. Internal evaluation as an appropriate approach to improve higher education system (the case study of agricultural extension and education Department, Tarbiat Modarres University). Res Planning Higher Edu. 2023;9(3):27-48.
21. Gh M, Haji-Hosseinnejad G. Designing of curriculum model for training teacher educator based on competencie’s reflective practice. J Curriculum Stu. 2018;13(50):45-74.
22. Hatami J, Shahmouhammadi M, Choopankare V, Yadgar M. Industrial design curriculum requirements in Iran. J Visual Applied Arts. 2017;9(18):121-35.
23. Magnussen L, Amundson MJ. Undergraduate nursing student experience. Nurs Health Sci. 2003;5(4):261-7. [PubMed ID:14622377]. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2018.2003.00158.x.
24. Poudeh MD, Shams B, Ashourioun V, Esmaeilee A, Nasri P, Hosseini M. Internal assessment of Isfahan general medicine curriculum based on basic standards of ministry of health and medical education: A model for evaluation and analysis of results. Iran J med Edu. 2011;10(5).
25. Nasri F. Provide an optimal model for assessing the quality of the naval strategic criminal training system. Interdisciplinary Studies on Strategic Knowledge. 2019;3(9):163-200.
26. Piri M, Asadian S, Derakhshani S. Evaluation of the quality of physical education curriculum (exercise physiology) in the master’s degree from the viewpoint of students. J Applied Exercise Physiol. 2018;14(27):77-85.
27. Ramsden P. Learning to Lead in Higher Education. 1998.
28. Khoshsima H, Mohammadi J, Mostafapour E. A comparative study of students’ and teachers’ attitude toward self assessment: A case study of iranian context. International J. 2016;3(1).
29. Sanyal BC, Martin M. Quality assurance and the role of accreditation: An overview. Report: Higher education in the world 2007: Accreditation for quality assurance: What is at stake? 2007.
30. Tirgar A, Kazemi F, Babazadeh S, Aghalari Z, Gholinia-Ahangar H. Assessing the Students ’ Viewpoint about teaching a course by several lecturer in Babol University of Medical Sciences. Res Med Edu. 2018;10(1):38-0. https://doi.org/10.29252/rme.10.1.38.
31. Paul R. Learning to teach in higher education. RoutledgeFalmer London. 2003.
32. Prajogo DI, Sohal AS. The relationship between organization strategy, total quality management (TQM), and organization performance––the mediating role of TQM. Europ J Operational Res. 2006;168(1):35-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.03.033.
33. Ghoorchian N, Shahrakipoor H. Study of the World’s Higher Education Assessment Systems to Propose an Appropriate Assessment Model for Iran’s Higher Education Assessment Aystem. Future study Management. 2010;21(85):1-19.
34. Piri Sagharloo M, Tahriri A, Hejazi R, Samadi Larghani M. The role of leadership, planning, and supervision of the higher education system in the development of academic accounting in Iran. Accounting Auditing Res. 2022;14(56):31-52.
35. Rahdari M, Nasr AR, Nili MR, Tork Ladani B. Evaluating professional skills and employment status of baccalaureate\’s alumni in Information Technology Engineering. Res Planning Higher Edu. 2023;21(2):1-24.
36. Faraji Armaki A, Panahi B. Viewpoint of general medicine students and faculty members about basic sciences curriculum. Edu Strategies in Med Sci. 2011;4(2):73-6.
37. FATHI VK, KHOSRAVI BA, Hajatmand F. Evaluating internal quality of educational programs of Ph. D medical ethics curriculum from point of professors and students. Medical Ethics. 2014.
38. Nasrollahinia F, Yamanidouzi M, Arefi M, Mohamadi R. Survay quality of implementation of internal evaluation of departments in shahid beheshti university From the perspective of fac-ulty members. J Educat Planning Stud. 2019;8(15):121-47.
39. Karami M, Fattahi H. Changing higher education curriculum, case study: Graduate curriculum in educational planning. J Higher Edu Curriculum Stu. 2013;4(7):110-36.
40. Ebrahim Kafoori K, Maleki H, Khosravi Babadi A. The study of the influence of klein’s curriculum components on the 1st grade of high school studentsâ math course drop out: Considering the
viewpoint of the curriculum counterparts. Res in Curriculum Planning. 2015;12(44):50-62.
41. Mehrmohammadi M. [Curriculum: Theories, approaches and perspectives]. Tehran: Samt& behnashr press. 2009. Persian.
42. Lewy A, Nevo D. Evaluation roles in education. Gordon & Breach Science Pub. 1981.
43. Lattuca LR, Stark JS. Shaping the college curriculum: Academic plans in context. John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
44. Waks LJ. How Globalization Can Cause Fundamental Curriculum Change: An American Perspective. J Edu Change. 2003;4(4):383-418. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:Jedu.0000006068.61419.90.
45. YAMANI N, NASR A, SABRI M. Curriculum Renewal In Medical Education. Curriculum Renewal In Medical Education. 2010.
46. Hull E, St Romain JA, Alexander P, Schaff S, Jones W. Moving cemeteries: a framework for facilitating curriculum revision. Nurse Educ. 2001;26(6):280-2. [PubMed ID:12141645]. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006223-200111000-00013.
47. Cuellar N. The seven habits for highly effective curriculum revision. Nurse Educ. 2001;26(2):61-3. [PubMed ID:16372626]. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006223-200103000-00008.
48. Thornton SJ. Educating the educators: Rethinking subject matter and methods. Theory Into Practice. 2001;40(1):72-8. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4001_11.
49. Shobeiri SM, Shamsi S. Internal quality assessment program Master of Education degree from the perspective of teachers, students and educational experts Payam Noor University. Res School Virtual Learning. 2015;3(9):83-94.
50. Bayanfar F, Maleki H, Dlavar A, Saif A-A. A study on the probable impact of junior high school hidden curriculum on student achievement: Presenting an efficient model. Educational Innovations. 2011;10(1):71-100.
51. Bagherinia F, Bagherinia H, Rahim Mosavi S. Assessment of the students’ attitude toward business with regard to higher education curriculum: Case study of Esfarayen University. Inter J Management, Accounting Economics. 2015;2(8).
52. Amini M, MARZOOGHI R, Mazidi M, Torkzadeh J, Mohammadi M. An investigation into the outcomes of implicit curriculum in higher education. J Theory and Practice. 2015.
53. Keshavarzi M, Rahgozar H. The place and role of curriculum in industrial training. Curriculum. 2011.
54. Akker J. Vanden.(2003). Curriculum persective: An introduction. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher; 2003.
55. Fathi Vajargah K, Hasan Pardakhtchi M, Rabeeyi M. Effectiveness evaluation of virtual learning courses in high education system of IRAN (Case of Ferdowsi University). Info communicat technology edu sci. 2011;1(4):5-21.
56. Mehrmohammadi M. Curriculum Theories, Approaches and Perspectives. Tehran. Swiss Association Market Technicians. 2010.
57. Mehdizadeh AH, Shafiei N. The assessment of curriculum quality in teachers education courses. J Edu Psychol. 2009;1(1):43-57.
58. Lehoux P, Battista RN, Granados A, Gallo P, Tailliez S, Coyle D, etal. International Master’s Program in health technology assessment and management: Assessment of the first edition (2001--2003). Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21(1):104-12. [PubMed ID:15736521]. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462305050130.
59. Zolfaghari M, Yazdizadeh B. Quality of the curriculum of health technology assessment master program in Iran. Health Technol Assessment in Action. 2020.
60. Amini M, Ganji M, Yazdkhasti A. Quality assessment of engineering curricula based on the views of students (case study: Kashan University). Iran J Engineering Edu. 2012;14(55):61-87.
61. Khan SH, Saeed M. Evaluating the quality of BEd programme: Students’ views of their college experiences. Teach Teacher Edu. 2010;26(4):760-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.011.
62. Kırkgöz Y. The challenge of developing and maintaining curriculum innovation at higher education. Procedia - Social Behavioral Sci. 2009;1(1):73-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.015.
63. Ghorrabi AT, Heydari M, Choobdarnezhad M, Dahim A, Heydarifard Z. Evaluation of the overall quality of the health technology assessment educational program from the perspectives of university professors and learners in Iran. Health Technol Assessment Action. 2023. https://doi.org/10.18502/htaa.v7i1.13301.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 7, No 2 (2023) | |
| Section | Review Article | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/htaa.v7i2.13814 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Criticism Evaluation Quality Curriculum Revision Narrative Review | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
How to Cite
1.
HeydariFard Z, Tahmasebi Ghorrabi A, Goharinezhad S, Masoudi Asl I, Dahim A. Criticism of Curriculum Quality Assessment Models: A Narrative Review. Health Tech Ass Act. 2023;7(2).
