Quality of the Curriculum of Health Technology Assessment Master Program in Iran
Abstract
Objectives: It is essential to improve the educational curriculum over time. This study aims to evaluate the quality of the health technology assessment (HTA) curriculum in Iran.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in three groups of professors, students, and graduates of HTA by the census. The data needed for this purpose were collected using a specific questionnaire. Finally, descriptive and analytical statistics were used for data analysis.
Results: Of 127 individuals, 114 ones responded to the study (response rate = 89%). The quality of the curriculum in terms of design elements in the core courses and the elements of the executive courses in the curriculum are in the range of medium to medium-to-optimal (1.66< mean> 2.32 to mean> 2.32, respectively). Also, the majority of the elements of the core courses and design elements are from compensatory courses in an unfavorable to moderate (1.66> mean to 1.66< mean> 2.32, respectively).
Conclusions: The results of this study showed that there was no significant problem in most design elements of the curriculum sections. However, there are some challenges in some elements of the operation. Therefore, it is suggested madding some changes to correct inappropriate elements. To achieve this objective, it is necessary to investigate the interests of other stakeholders involved in this field and thus enhance the quality of the curriculum. Implementing the proposed proposals and reviewing the curriculum studied can be considered as an important step to improve the HTA curriculum in Iran.
2. NaserHamzeKhanloo M & Bazyar M (2010) Role and necessity of health technology assessment (HTA) in health system. Journal of Health 1, 59-68.
3. Arab Zozani M, Amery H & Jafari A (2014) The role of health technology assessment in evidence-based decision making and health policy: a review study. Journal of Health Administration 17, 99-112.
4. Cheserek G (2010) Quality Management in Curriculum Development and Delivery in African Universities: A Case Study of Moi University, Kenya. Challenges for faculty management at African higher education institutions 41.
5. Noorabadi S, Musapour N, Aliasgari M & Hajihosseinnajad G (2015) Evaluating the Quality of Interdisciplinary Curricula of Humanities In Iranian Higher Education. Journal of Theory & Practice in Curriculum 2, 55-84.
6. Bray M (2010) Comparative education and international education in the history of Compare: boundaries, overlaps and ambiguities. Compare 40, 711-25.
7. Sanyal BC & Martin M (2007) Quality assurance and the role of accreditation: An overview. Report: Higher Education in the World 2007: Accreditation for Quality Assurance: What is at Stake?
8. Amini M, Rahimi H & reza Khodabakhshi H (2018) The evaluation of quality of curriculum elements in education field. Journal of Development Strategies in Medical Education 5, 1-12.
9. Olry de Labry Lima A, García Mochón L, Caro Martínez A, Martín Ruiz E & Espín Balbino J (2016) Mapping capacity to conduct health technology assessment in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. Croatian medical journal 57, 66-70.
10. Vajargah KF, Babadi AK & Hajatmand F (2014) Evaluating internal quality of educational programs of Ph. D medical ethics curriculum from point of professors and students. Medical Ethics Journal 8, 129-52.
11. Ebrahimi Kafoori K, Maleki H & KhosraviBabadi AA (2015) The Study of the Influence of Klein'sCurriculum Components on the 1st grade ofHigh school students’ Math Course Drop out:considering the viewpoint of the curriculum counterparts Research in Curriculum Planning 12, 50-62.
12. Khosravi R, Fathi Vajargah K & Ashtiani M (2014) Pathology of Life Skills Curriculum in Secondary Education System. Training & Learning Researches 2, 1-18.
13. Douw K, Vondeling H, Bakketeig LS, et al. (2002) HTA education and training in Europe. International journal of technology assessment in health care 18, 808-19.
14. Lehoux P, Battista RN, Granados A, et al. (2005) International Master's Program in health technology assessment and management: Assessment of the first edition (2001–2003). International journal of technology assessment in health care 21, 104-112.
Files | ||
Issue | Vol 4, No 3 (2020) | |
Section | Articles | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/htaa.v4i3.6351 | |
Keywords | ||
Health Technology Assessment Curriculum Quality Assessment Evaluation |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |