Articles

Measuring Health System Efficiency; A Protocol Study

Abstract

Abstract
Background: To improve healthcare services’ quality, countries should measure their health systems’ efficiency and performance by robust methods.
Objectives: We aimed to develop a national study to measure the efficiency of the health system in Iran.
Methods: The literature review identified several methods for measuring efficiency; the most common one was data envelopment analysis (DEA). We adopted DEA, but its findings were simplistic and inaccurate, so we began to modify the method by determining the weight of each indicator. We identified the efficiency measurement indicators, in line with international standards and uniformed units, and then readjusted our input/output indicators according to the study context through four expert panels. We collected data and classified the input/output indicators, followed by determining each indicator’s weight and standard limits. Then we rationalized our previous results by applying the revised model. The initial new results of the refined model were valid, accurate, and consistent with previous studies, as approved by experts. We defined proper modeling to achieve the stated objectives. After investigating various DEA models, we finally designed a new model that was consistent with the existing data and conditions, entitled EDEA (extended DEA), to analyze other subprojects.
Conclusions: The conventional DEA methods may not be accurate enough to measure health systems’ efficiency. By modifying modeling process, we propose a modified DEA with a very low error rate. We suggest that others interested in measuring health system efficiency adopt our modified approach to increase accuracy and create more meaningful policy-oriented results.

References
1. Hollingsworth B: The measurement of efficiency and productivity of health care delivery. Health economics 2008, 17(10):1107-1128.
2. Varabyova Y, Müller J-M: The efficiency of health care production in OECD countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-country comparisons. Health Policy 2016, 120(3):252-263.
3. Masri MD, Asbu EZ: Productivity change of national health systems in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean region: application of DEA-based Malmquist productivity index. Global health research and policy 2018, 3(1):22.
4. Hunt D: Better outcomes at lower costs? The effect of public health expenditures on hospital efficiency. University of Delaware; 2016.
5. Nayar P, Ozcan YA: Data envelopment analysis comparison of hospital efficiency and quality. Journal of medical systems 2008, 32(3):193-199.
6. Hafidz F, Ensor T, Tubeuf S: Efficiency measurement in health facilities: A systematic review in low-and middle-income countries. Applied health economics and health policy 2018, 16(4):465-480.
7. Evans DB, Tandon A, Murray CJ, Lauer JA: The comparative efficiency of national health systems in producing health: an analysis of 191 countries. World Health Organization 2000, 29(29):1-36.
8. Hsu C-H, Chang A-Y, Luo W: Identifying key performance factors for sustainability development of SMEs–integrating QFD and fuzzy MADM methods. Journal of cleaner production 2017, 161:629-645.
9. Yazdani M, Zavadskas EK, Ignatius J, Abad MD: Sensitivity analysis in MADM methods: application of material selection. Engineering Economics 2016, 27(4):382-391.
10. Trestian R, Ormond O, Muntean G-M: Performance evaluation of MADM-based methods for network selection in a multimedia wireless environment. Wireless Networks 2015, 21(5):1745-1763.
11. Mobinizadeh M, Raeissi P, Nasiripour AA, Olyaeemanesh A, Tabibi SJ: A model for priority setting of health technology assessment: the experience of AHP-TOPSIS combination approach. DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2016, 24(1):10.
12. Danaei G, Farzadfar F, Kelishadi R, Rashidian A, Rouhani OM, Ahmadnia S, Ahmadvand A, Arabi M, Ardalan A, Arhami M: Iran in transition. The Lancet 2019.
13. Mehrdad R: Health system in Iran. JMAJ 2009, 52(1):69-73.
14. Naderimagham S, Jamshidi H, Khajavi A, Pishgar F, Ardam A, Larijani B, Mahmoudi Z, Jeddian A, Bahrami-Taghanaki HR, Farzadfar F: Impact of rural family physician program on child mortality rates in Iran: a time-series study. Population health metrics 2017, 15(1):21.
15. Takian A, Rashidian A, Kabir MJ: Expediency and coincidence in re-engineering a health system: an interpretive approach to formation of family medicine in Iran. Health policy and planning 2010, 26(2):163-173.
16. Piroozi B, Takian A, Moradi G, Amerzadeh M, Safari H, Faraji O: The effect of Iran's health transformation plan on utilization of specialized outpatient visit services: An interrupted time series. Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran 2018, 32:121.
17. Organization WH: World health statistics 2016: monitoring health for the SDGs sustainable development goals: World Health Organization; 2016.
18. Bussieck MR, Meeraus A: General algebraic modeling system (GAMS). In: Modeling languages in mathematical optimization. Springer; 2004: 137-157.
19. Bahadori M, Izadi AR, Ghardashi F, Ravangard R, Hosseini SM: The evaluation of hospital performance in Iran: a systematic review article. Iranian journal of public health 2016, 45(7):855.
20. Dong S, Zuo Y, Guo S, Li M, Liu X, Li H: Data envelopment analysis for relative efficiency measurements of Chinese hospitals: a systematic review. Research Heal Sci 2017, 2(2):79-103.
Files
IssueVol 6, No 1 (2022) QRcode
SectionArticles
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/htaa.v6i1.11132
Keywords
Efficiency Health system Productivity Protocol

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F, Olyaeemanesh A, Mohamadi E, Majdzadeh R, Akbari Sari A, Harirchi I, Haghdoost A, Sharafi H, Sajadi HS, Goodarzi Z, Noori Hekmat S, Kiani MM, Freidoony L, Takian A. Measuring Health System Efficiency; A Protocol Study. Health Tech Ass Act. 2022;6(1).