Using Managed Entry Agreements as an Effective Tool to Handle the Uncertainty in Health Technology Assessments
Abstract
Although the access to innovative medicines is usually informed by health technology assessment reports, underlying uncertainties in HTA may delay such access. Managed Entry Agreements may provide a promising solution to handle such uncertainty through focusing on value for information. Notably, majority of MEA designs include volume-based pricing and not outcome-based pricing strategies – which is an optimal access pathway for rare disease drugs. This is attributed to transparency issues regarding MEA content. This article proposes a framework which may be helpful which considering MEA within the context of low-and-middle-income countries using an interdisciplinary approach. This included needs assessment, value framework, governance, and choice of outcomes.
1. Godman B, Bucsics A, Vella Bonanno P, Oortwijn W, Rothe CC, Ferrario A, et al. Barriers for Access to New Medicines: Searching for the Balance Between Rising Costs and Limited Budgets. Front Public Health. 2018 Dec 5;6:328.
2. root-causes-unvailability-delay-cra-final-300620.pdf [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 12]. Available from: https://www.efpia.eu/media/554527/root-causes-unvailability-delay-cra-final-300620.pdf
3. Panteli D, Edwards S, Richardson E, Palm W, Mossialos E. Policy brief [Internet]. Ensuring access to medicines: How to stimulate innovation to meet patients’ needs? [Internet]. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2018 [cited 2021 Nov 12]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK526401/
4. Bouvy JC, Sapede C, Garner S. Managed Entry Agreements for Pharmaceuticals in the Context of Adaptive Pathways in Europe. Front Pharmacol. 2018 Mar 27;9:280.
5. Garrison LP, Towse A, Briggs A, de Pouvourville G, Grueger J, Mohr PE, et al. Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements—Good Practices for Design, Implementation, and Evaluation: Report of the ISPOR Good Practices for Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements Task Force. Value Health. 2013 Jul 1;16(5):703–19.
6. Medicare Coverage Document - Guidance for the Public, Industry, and CMS Staff: Coverage with Evidence Development [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 23]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/medicare-coverage-document.aspx?MCDId=27
7. NHS England » Cancer Drugs Fund [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 23]. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/cancer/cdf/
8. Dabbous M, Chachoua L, Caban A, Toumi M. Managed Entry Agreements: Policy Analysis From the European Perspective. Value Health. 2020 Apr 1;23(4):425–33.
9. Macaulay R. Managed Access Agreements: A New Model Pathway for The Reimbursement of Non-Oncology Drugs in England Approved Under European Adaptive Pathways? Value Health. 2016 Nov 1;19(7):A505.
10. Adaptive pathways | European Medicines Agency [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 23]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/research-development/adaptive-pathways
11. Castro HE, Malpica-Llanos T, Musila R, Konduri N, Amaris A, Sullivan J, et al. Sharing knowledge for policy action in low- and middle-income countries: A literature review of managed entry agreements. Med Access Point Care. 2019 Jan 1;3:2399202619834246.
12. Innovative pharma contracts: When do value-based arrangements work? | McKinsey [Internet]. [cited 2021 Jul 8]. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/pharmaceuticals-and-medical-products/our-insights/innovative-pharma-contracts-when-do-value-based-arrangements-work
13. Charter R. Managed Entry Agreements for Medical Devices: Great Opportunity or Major Challenge? :9.
14. Dunlop WCN, Staufer A, Levy P, Edwards GJ. Innovative pharmaceutical pricing agreements in five European markets: A survey of stakeholder attitudes and experience. Health Policy. 2018 May 1;122(5):528–32.
15. Jarosławski S, Toumi M. Market access agreements for pharmaceuticals in Europe: diversity of approaches and underlying concepts. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 8;11:259.
16. Kanavos P, Ferrario A, Tafuri G, Siviero P. Managing Risk and Uncertainty in Health Technology Introduction: The Role of Managed Entry Agreements. Glob Policy. 2017;8(S2):84–92.
17. Grimm S, Strong M, Brennan A, Wailoo A. REPORT BY THE DECISION SUPPORT UNIT. :146.
18. Lucas F. Improving market access to rare disease therapies: A worldwide perspective with recommendations to the industry. Med Access Point Care. 2018 Jan 1;2:2399202618810121.
19. Facey KM, Espin J, Kent E, Link A, Nicod E, O’Leary A, et al. Implementing Outcomes-Based Managed Entry Agreements for Rare Disease Treatments: Nusinersen and Tisagenlecleucel. PharmacoEconomics [Internet]. 2021 Jul 7 [cited 2021 Jul 8]; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-021-01050-5
20. Pauwels K, Huys I, Vogler S, Casteels M, Simoens S. Managed Entry Agreements for Oncology Drugs: Lessons from the European Experience to Inform the Future. Front Pharmacol. 2017 Apr 4;8:171.
21. Wenzl M, Chapman S. Performance-based managed entry agreements for new medicines in OECD countries and EU member states. 2019;(115). Available from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/paper/6e5e4c0f-en
22. Thanimalai S, Choon WY, Lee KK-C. Stakeholder views of managed entry agreements: A literature review of national studies. Health Policy OPEN. 2021 Dec 1;2:100032.
23. Value-based-procurement-report_0.pdf [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 12]. Available from: https://www.medtecheurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Value-based-procurement-report_0.pdf
24. Charter R. Managed Entry Agreements for Medical Devices: Great Opportunity or Major Challenge? In 2017. Available from: https://www.ispor.org/docs/default-source/presentations/1277.pdf?sfvrsn=c268f734_1
25. 2019_LeapfrogToValue.pdf [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 12]. Available from: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5db772d44638535b2114f2e6/t/5ddea52751c72e2c5edacd77/1574872363413/2019_LeapfrogToValue.pdf
26. Maskineh C, Nasser SC. Managed Entry Agreements for Pharmaceutical Products in Middle East and North African Countries: Payer and Manufacturer Experience and Outlook. Value Health Reg Issues. 2018 Sep 1;16:33–8.
Files | ||
Issue | Vol 5, No 4 (2021) | |
Section | Review Article | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/htaa.v5i4.10164 | |
Keywords | ||
Healthcare Service Accessibility medicines HTA cost benefit analysis quality adjusted life years |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |